False Heath Fritillary (Melitaea diamina)

next page          back to list

2009 photos highlighted in yellow. Click on any photo to go to an enlarged picture, or simply scroll down the page.

7488_male_Alpes Maritimes_25Jun07 7566_male_Alpes Maritimes_26Jun07 12775_male_Isere_11Jul08
03_03-10A_male_Ariege_Jun03 - form vernetensis 03_03-11A_male_Ariege_Jun03 - form vernetensis 17421_sex?_Hautes Alpes_07Jul09
7522_female_Alpes Maritimes_26Jun07 12487_male_Isere_10Jul08 18436_male_Isere_13Jul09

A very attractive and rather variable fritillary, usually (but not always) found at altitude. It is easily recognised because the uph black/dark brown has almost completely smothered the orange, reducing the orange to a series of disconnected spots mainly in the submarginal and post-discal areas. Darker specimens can look quite black in flight. It can vary in terms of size and shape, it seems to me, and can often be quite small.

 

7488: a small and heavily marked male, although averagely marked. Altitude 1080m.

7566: a male, in typical territorial pose, ready to see off all-comers. The darker areas are almost black, quite apparent in flight, contrasting well with the few bright orange marks. Altitude 1080m.

12775: a VERY dark male, although the dark uph is set off by the white margins. Altitude 1120m.

03_03-10A: this shot was taken in the Pyrenees and I think it must be diamina; the new Lafranchis book carries an illustration of the diamina form vernetensis from the Eastern Pyrenees, and this matches it exactly - the key-shaped discal spot in s1b of the upf is characteristic.

03_03-11A: another male of the Pyrenean form vernetensis, perhaps looking rather more recognisable as diamina on the basis of the heavy uph markings.

17421: a high altitude melanic aberration, very dark even by diamina standards. However, that concave forewing margin does not look like diamina. Comment invited. Altitude 1750m.

7522: a female, larger and generally lighter than most males. It looks very much like a dark Heath Fritillary (Mellicta athalia) although on balance I believe it to be diamina. Altitude 1080m.

12487: the underside is usually characterised by the discrete dark centres to the unh post-discal series of spots, but this is very murky and not at all distinctive. However, it has to be diamina, and a male, I think. The yellow-filled unh marginal band is strongly indicative. Altitude 1120m.

18436: a male, not unlike 12487 in that the unh post-discal spots are faint unfilled circles rather than the solid black dots normal of diamina. Altitude 1120m.

 

7488_male_Alpes Maritimes_25Jun07

 

7566_male_Alpes Maritimes_26Jun07

 

12775_male_Isere_11Jul08

 

17421_sex?_Hautes Alpes_07Jul09

 

7522_female_Alpes Maritimes_26Jun07

 

12487_male_Isere_10Jul08

 

18436_male_Isere_13Jul09